Search for: "City of Lago Vista" Results 1 - 20 of 43
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 May 2010, 10:12 am by CrimProf BlogEditor
City of Lago Vista (Mississippi Law Journal, Vol. 79, p. 115, 2009) on SSRN. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 10:06 am by Orin Kerr
City of Lago Vista, 532 U.S. 318 (2001), in which the Court considered whether the Fourth Amendment allows arrests even for very minor offenses. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 6:00 am
Lago Vista Independent School District (1998) Davis v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 9:46 am by Gritsforbreakfast
City of Lago Vista that police can make arrests for fine only offenses, so the new statute won't prevent people for going to jail over library fines. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 8:10 am by Gritsforbreakfast
City of Lago Vista that Texas police officers could arrest a Central Texas soccer mom for a Class C misdemeanor traffic offense (in this case, a seat belt violation), the Lege passed bipartisan legislation (Chris Harris in the Senate, Senfronia Thompson and Robert Talton in the House) to forbid arrests (with four limited exceptions) for offenses where the ultimate potential penalty would not include incarceration. [read post]
16 May 2010, 1:07 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Lago Vista said that Texas law allows arrests for these violations at officers' discretion. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:50 am by Michael M. O'Hear
City of Lago Vista, in which the Court held that a full-blown custodial arrest may be made if the police have probable cause to suspect that even a low-level traffic violation has occurred. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 8:53 am by Gritsforbreakfast
City of Lago Vista), I'll bet somebody out there can top it. [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 10:20 am by Gritsforbreakfast
City of Lago Vista (a seat belt violation case) that whether officers could arrest for Class Cs is a legislative decision, and that state lawmakers would need to change the statute. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 8:12 pm by Michael J.Z. Mannheimer
City of Lago Vista, for example, the Court held that police could arrest for any offense for which they had probable cause, even one that was a "fine-only" offense, i.e., did not have any possible jail time attached. [read post]